Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
Mikepinder (Talk | contribs) (→Structure) |
Mikepinder (Talk | contribs) (→Structure) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Structure == | == Structure == | ||
| − | [[File:hackers-and-innovation-mike-pinder- | + | [[File:hackers-and-innovation-mike-pinder-3.png]] |
<big>'''''Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies'''''</big> | <big>'''''Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies'''''</big> | ||
Revision as of 13:29, 30 August 2014
Contents
Welcome
Welcome to the Hacker Innovation Wiki. This has been created to discuss a term in detail that I have coined 'Hacker Innovation'. I am currently putting together a work in progress monograph entitled, Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies and this site is a place for others to critically discuss and contribute to the topic.
This is work in progress, therefore I will be adding, updating, editing and revising sections based on new observations and feedback.
How to leave feedback?
There are several ways to leave feedback on each of the chapters, pages or sections. I have included a discussion section at the bottom of each chapter and you can also register and leave comments in the discussion tab at the top of each page. You will need to register (link at the top) in order to leave comments and feedback.
Structure
Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies
Chapter 1 - Traditional Conceptions of Hacking
Chapter 2 - Re-defining and Understanding True Hacking
Chapter 3 - Hacker Ethics and Morals
Chapter 4 - Hackers, Problem Solving and Innovation
Chapter 5 - Hacker Innovation and Consumer Artefacts
Chapter 6 - Implications of Hacker Innovation for Firms
Footnotes
- [NB 1] ^ "Abused" because it means we have to take care of the footnote numbering manually.In this sample can be used ref/references subnotes. I think that it is more convinient for this case. --X-romix
- [NB 2] We can do similar things with the "group" feature of standard footnotes.
Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.
