Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Hacker Innovation: Redefinition and Examination of Outlaw Sources of Generativity for Future Product Development Strategies (2014) by Mike Pinder
Jump to: navigation, search
(Structure)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
<big>'''Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies'''</big>
 
<big>'''Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies'''</big>
 +
  
 
'''[[Introduction]]'''
 
'''[[Introduction]]'''
Line 28: Line 29:
  
 
[NB 1]
 
[NB 1]
 
 
  
 
==Footnotes==
 
==Footnotes==

Revision as of 10:23, 30 August 2014

Welcome

Welcome to the Hacker Innovation Wiki. This has been created to discuss a term in detail that I have coined 'Hacker Innovation'. I am currently putting together a work in progress monograph entitled, Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies and this site is a place for others to critically discuss and contribute to the topic.

There are several ways to leave feedback on each of the chapters, pages or sections. I have included a discussion section at the bottom of each chapter and you can also register and leave comments in the discussion tab at the top of each page.

Structure

Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies


Introduction

Chapter 1 - Traditional Conceptions of Hacking

Chapter 2 - Re-defining and Understanding True Hacking

Chapter 3 - Hacker Ethics and Morals

Chapter 4 - Hackers, Problem Solving and Innovation

Chapter 5 - Hacker Innovation and Consumer Artefacts

Chapter 6 - Implications of Hacker Innovation for Firms

References


[NB 1]

Footnotes

  • [NB 1] ^ "Abused" because it means we have to take care of the footnote numbering manually.In this sample can be used ref/references subnotes. I think that it is more convinient for this case. --X-romix
  • [NB 2] We can do similar things with the "group" feature of standard footnotes.



Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.

Getting started