Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
From Hacker Innovation: Redefinition and Examination of Outlaw Sources of Generativity for Future Product Development Strategies (2014) by Mike Pinder
Mikepinder (Talk | contribs) |
Mikepinder (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<strong>Welcome to Hacker Innovation[NB 1]</strong> | <strong>Welcome to Hacker Innovation[NB 1]</strong> | ||
| + | This Wiki has been created to... | ||
| − | + | = Contents = | |
| − | + | '''Introduction''' | |
| − | + | '''Chapter 1''' - [Tradition Conceptions of Hacking] | |
| − | + | '''Chapter 2''' - [Re-defining and Understanding True Hacking] | |
| − | + | '''Chapter 3''' - [Hacker Ethics and Morals] | |
| + | '''Chapter 4''' - [Hackers, Problem Solving and Innovation] | ||
| + | '''Chapter 5''' - [Hacker Innovation and Consumer Artefacts] | ||
| + | '''Chapter 6''' - [Implications of Hacker Innovation for Firms] | ||
| + | [References] | ||
Revision as of 10:01, 30 August 2014
Welcome to Hacker Innovation[NB 1]
This Wiki has been created to...
Contents
Introduction Chapter 1 - [Tradition Conceptions of Hacking] Chapter 2 - [Re-defining and Understanding True Hacking] Chapter 3 - [Hacker Ethics and Morals] Chapter 4 - [Hackers, Problem Solving and Innovation] Chapter 5 - [Hacker Innovation and Consumer Artefacts] Chapter 6 - [Implications of Hacker Innovation for Firms] [References]
Footnotes
- [NB 1] ^ "Abused" because it means we have to take care of the footnote numbering manually.In this sample can be used ref/references subnotes. I think that it is more convinient for this case. --X-romix
- [NB 2] We can do similar things with the "group" feature of standard footnotes.
Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.
