Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Hacker Innovation: Redefinition and Examination of Outlaw Sources of Generativity for Future Product Development Strategies (2014) by Mike Pinder
Jump to: navigation, search
(Welcome)
(Structure)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
== Structure ==
 
== Structure ==
  
<big>'''Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies'''</big>
+
<big>'''''Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies'''''</big>
  
  

Revision as of 10:28, 30 August 2014

Welcome

Welcome to the Hacker Innovation Wiki. This has been created to discuss a term in detail that I have coined 'Hacker Innovation'. I am currently putting together a work in progress monograph entitled, Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies and this site is a place for others to critically discuss and contribute to the topic.

This is work in progress, therefore I will be adding, updating, editing and revising sections based on new observations and feedback.

How to leave feedback?

There are several ways to leave feedback on each of the chapters, pages or sections. I have included a discussion section at the bottom of each chapter and you can also register and leave comments in the discussion tab at the top of each page. You will need to register (link at the top) in order to leave comments and feedback.

Structure

Hackers and innovation: redefinition and examination of outlaw sources of generativity for future product development strategies


Introduction

Chapter 1 - Traditional Conceptions of Hacking

Chapter 2 - Re-defining and Understanding True Hacking

Chapter 3 - Hacker Ethics and Morals

Chapter 4 - Hackers, Problem Solving and Innovation

Chapter 5 - Hacker Innovation and Consumer Artefacts

Chapter 6 - Implications of Hacker Innovation for Firms

References


[NB 1]

Footnotes

  • [NB 1] ^ "Abused" because it means we have to take care of the footnote numbering manually.In this sample can be used ref/references subnotes. I think that it is more convinient for this case. --X-romix
  • [NB 2] We can do similar things with the "group" feature of standard footnotes.



Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.

Getting started